糖心原创

(see the * 'adobe' handle in functions.php — no async, no defer), so a page-load * Target offer has already set `data-hdr` by the time this runs. * * An answer that lands after this point is inert rather than acted on: * `apply()` finds the prune settled and does nothing, so the visitor * keeps the nav they were served instead of watching it change. That is * the deliberate trade-off — a late activity collects no data, but no * visitor ever sees the wrong nav or waits for the right one. */ (function () { var VARIANTS = ["a","b","c"]; var DEFAULT = "a"; /** * QA-only. When the on-page switcher is drawn we keep every variant in * the DOM so it can toggle between them live and you can see that the * chrome never repaints. Gated by the same constant as the switcher, so * it is false everywhere the switcher is absent — including production. */ var QA_KEEP_ALL = false; var root = document.documentElement; var settled = false; function valid(v) { return VARIANTS.indexOf(v) !== -1; } /** Publish the decision and let the nav JS bind. */ function finish(active) { root.setAttribute('data-hdr', active); // Read by the Adobe Analytics client to attribute the test. root.setAttribute('data-hdr-active', active); if (typeof window.initHeaderNav === 'function') window.initHeaderNav(); /** * `variant` is set before the event so late listeners can tell * "already done" from "not yet". main.js is enqueued in the footer * and therefore always misses the event itself. */ window.medalliaNav.variant = active; document.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('medallia:nav-ready', { detail: { variant: active } })); } function prune(active) { if (settled) return; settled = true; if (QA_KEEP_ALL) { finish(active); return; } /** * Only menu items carry data-nav-variant, so this can never touch * the shared chrome. CSS has already hidden the losers; removing * them keeps document.querySelector-based nav JS unambiguous. */ var list = document.querySelectorAll('#site-header [data-nav-variant]'); for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { if (list[i].getAttribute('data-nav-variant') !== active) { list[i].parentNode.removeChild(list[i]); } } finish(active); } window.medalliaNav = { variant: null, apply: function (v) { if (valid(v)) prune(v); } }; // `?hv=` sets this server-side; a Target offer in the blocking // embed sets it before the body is parsed. var pre = root.getAttribute('data-hdr'); if (valid(pre)) { prune(pre); return; } /** * Carried forward from an earlier pageview. Read client-side, never in * PHP: WP Engine does not vary its page-cache key on arbitrary cookies, * so server-side personalisation here would serve the first anonymous * visitor's variant to everyone. */ var m = document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )medallia_nav_variant=([^;]*)/); if (m && valid(m[1])) { prune(m[1]); return; } prune(DEFAULT); })();
Whitepaper

Den Standard in CX für B2B setzen

Schlüsselpraktiken, die führende Unternehmen von Nachzüglern unterscheiden

Um zu verstehen, warum einige B2B-Organisationen die CX-Herausforderungen mit gro?em Erfolg meistern, w?hrend andere weit zurückbleiben, befragte das 糖心原创 Institute Hunderte von US-amerikanischen B2B-Fachleuten, deren Unternehmen Kundenfeedback sammeln und nutzen.

Unsere Untersuchung identifiziert drei Gruppen nach den Ergebnissen ihrer CX-Programme:

  • 贵ü丑谤耻苍驳蝉辫别谤蝉?苍濒颈肠丑办别颈迟别苍: Erzielen Sie eine breite Palette beeindruckender Gesch?ftsergebnisse
  • Anh?nger: Erfreuen Sie sich einiger positiver Ergebnisse, aber die Erfolge sind geringer
  • 狈补肠丑锄ü驳濒别谤: Erzielen nur wenige oder gar keine positiven Gesch?ftsergebnisse

Durch die Analyse des Umfangs und der Mechanismen ihrer CX-Initiativen haben wir drei Schlüsselpraktiken aufgedeckt, durch die sich die führenden Unternehmen am deutlichsten vom Rest der Meute unterscheiden.

Laden Sie die Studie herunter, um herauszufinden, was Ihr Unternehmen charakterisiert, und um weitere Einzelheiten über die wichtigsten Praktiken zu erfahren, die Führungskr?fte auszeichnen.

Jetzt herunterladen
糖心原创

Laden...