糖心原创

(see the * 'adobe' handle in functions.php — no async, no defer), so a page-load * Target offer has already set `data-hdr` by the time this runs. * * An answer that lands after this point is inert rather than acted on: * `apply()` finds the prune settled and does nothing, so the visitor * keeps the nav they were served instead of watching it change. That is * the deliberate trade-off — a late activity collects no data, but no * visitor ever sees the wrong nav or waits for the right one. */ (function () { var VARIANTS = ["a","b","c"]; var DEFAULT = "a"; var root = document.documentElement; var settled = false; function valid(v) { return VARIANTS.indexOf(v) !== -1; } function prune(active) { if (settled) return; settled = true; var list = document.querySelectorAll('#site-header > .header-variant'); for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { if (list[i].getAttribute('data-header-variant') !== active) { list[i].parentNode.removeChild(list[i]); } } root.setAttribute('data-hdr', active); // Read by the Adobe Analytics client to attribute the test. root.setAttribute('data-hdr-active', active); if (typeof window.initHeaderNav === 'function') window.initHeaderNav(); /** * `variant` is set before the event so late listeners can tell * "already done" from "not yet". main.js is enqueued in the footer * and therefore always misses the event itself. */ window.medalliaNav.variant = active; document.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('medallia:nav-ready', { detail: { variant: active } })); } window.medalliaNav = { variant: null, apply: function (v) { if (valid(v)) prune(v); } }; // `?hv=` sets this server-side; a Target offer in the blocking // embed sets it before the body is parsed. var pre = root.getAttribute('data-hdr'); if (valid(pre)) { prune(pre); return; } /** * Carried forward from an earlier pageview. Read client-side, never in * PHP: WP Engine does not vary its page-cache key on arbitrary cookies, * so server-side personalisation here would serve the first anonymous * visitor's variant to everyone. */ var m = document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )medallia_nav_variant=([^;]*)/); if (m && valid(m[1])) { prune(m[1]); return; } prune(DEFAULT); })();

Fallstudie

Fallstudie: Auto & General: Steigerung der Projekttr?ger um 20 % in den ersten 18 Monaten

Auto & General, ein australischer Versicherungsanbieter und frischgebackener Gewinner des ?Australian Customer Service Excellence Award“, bek?mpft die Kundenabwanderung, indem es seine bisher kundenfreundliche Kultur zu einer kundenorientierten Kultur umgestaltet. Seit der Einführung der CEM-Plattform 糖心原创verzeichnet Auto & General einen Anstieg des NPS um 11 Punkte, und der Anteil der Fürsprecher ist um 20 % gestiegen. Durch den Einsatz von Multichannel-Kommunikation und Textanalysen, um den Feedbackkreis schlie?en Echtzeit den Feedbackkreis schlie?en und die Ursachen im Kundenfeedback zu identifizieren, bindet Auto & General das gesamte Unternehmen in die Kundenbetreuung ein.

Verwandte Ressourcen