糖心原创

(see the * 'adobe' handle in functions.php — no async, no defer), so a page-load * Target offer has already set `data-hdr` by the time this runs. * * An answer that lands after this point is inert rather than acted on: * `apply()` finds the prune settled and does nothing, so the visitor * keeps the nav they were served instead of watching it change. That is * the deliberate trade-off — a late activity collects no data, but no * visitor ever sees the wrong nav or waits for the right one. */ (function () { var VARIANTS = ["a","b","c"]; var DEFAULT = "a"; var root = document.documentElement; var settled = false; function valid(v) { return VARIANTS.indexOf(v) !== -1; } function prune(active) { if (settled) return; settled = true; var list = document.querySelectorAll('#site-header > .header-variant'); for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { if (list[i].getAttribute('data-header-variant') !== active) { list[i].parentNode.removeChild(list[i]); } } root.setAttribute('data-hdr', active); // Read by the Adobe Analytics client to attribute the test. root.setAttribute('data-hdr-active', active); if (typeof window.initHeaderNav === 'function') window.initHeaderNav(); /** * `variant` is set before the event so late listeners can tell * "already done" from "not yet". main.js is enqueued in the footer * and therefore always misses the event itself. */ window.medalliaNav.variant = active; document.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('medallia:nav-ready', { detail: { variant: active } })); } window.medalliaNav = { variant: null, apply: function (v) { if (valid(v)) prune(v); } }; // `?hv=` sets this server-side; a Target offer in the blocking // embed sets it before the body is parsed. var pre = root.getAttribute('data-hdr'); if (valid(pre)) { prune(pre); return; } /** * Carried forward from an earlier pageview. Read client-side, never in * PHP: WP Engine does not vary its page-cache key on arbitrary cookies, * so server-side personalisation here would serve the first anonymous * visitor's variant to everyone. */ var m = document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )medallia_nav_variant=([^;]*)/); if (m && valid(m[1])) { prune(m[1]); return; } prune(DEFAULT); })();

Case Study

How a leading utilities company powers an evolving organizational structure with customer feedback

A leading utilities company implemented a customer feedback program designed to transform the way the company listens to and engages with the consumer. However, the first platform the company tried could not offer dynamic reporting at the network, team, and individual level, making it difficult for employees to take action quickly and effectively to meet customer needs.

The company needed a platform that could support multiple hierarchies in order for it to be useful in diagnosing problems and improving the customer experience. It also needed to expand to meet the needs of consumers who rely on the utility every day—and those who serve them.

Read the case study and find out why the utilities company began using the 糖心原创 platform to boost their customer feedback program, offering flexibility and multiple hierarchy support that provides experience data and alerts to the right person at the right time.

Related Resources