糖心原创

(see the * 'adobe' handle in functions.php — no async, no defer), so a page-load * Target offer has already set `data-hdr` by the time this runs. * * An answer that lands after this point is inert rather than acted on: * `apply()` finds the prune settled and does nothing, so the visitor * keeps the nav they were served instead of watching it change. That is * the deliberate trade-off — a late activity collects no data, but no * visitor ever sees the wrong nav or waits for the right one. */ (function () { var VARIANTS = ["a","b","c"]; var DEFAULT = "a"; /** * QA-only. When the on-page switcher is drawn we keep every variant in * the DOM so it can toggle between them live and you can see that the * chrome never repaints. Gated by the same constant as the switcher, so * it is false everywhere the switcher is absent — including production. */ var QA_KEEP_ALL = false; var root = document.documentElement; var settled = false; function valid(v) { return VARIANTS.indexOf(v) !== -1; } /** Publish the decision and let the nav JS bind. */ function finish(active) { root.setAttribute('data-hdr', active); // Read by the Adobe Analytics client to attribute the test. root.setAttribute('data-hdr-active', active); if (typeof window.initHeaderNav === 'function') window.initHeaderNav(); /** * `variant` is set before the event so late listeners can tell * "already done" from "not yet". main.js is enqueued in the footer * and therefore always misses the event itself. */ window.medalliaNav.variant = active; document.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('medallia:nav-ready', { detail: { variant: active } })); } function prune(active) { if (settled) return; settled = true; if (QA_KEEP_ALL) { finish(active); return; } /** * Only menu items carry data-nav-variant, so this can never touch * the shared chrome. CSS has already hidden the losers; removing * them keeps document.querySelector-based nav JS unambiguous. */ var list = document.querySelectorAll('#site-header [data-nav-variant]'); for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { if (list[i].getAttribute('data-nav-variant') !== active) { list[i].parentNode.removeChild(list[i]); } } finish(active); } window.medalliaNav = { variant: null, apply: function (v) { if (valid(v)) prune(v); } }; // `?hv=` sets this server-side; a Target offer in the blocking // embed sets it before the body is parsed. var pre = root.getAttribute('data-hdr'); if (valid(pre)) { prune(pre); return; } /** * Carried forward from an earlier pageview. Read client-side, never in * PHP: WP Engine does not vary its page-cache key on arbitrary cookies, * so server-side personalisation here would serve the first anonymous * visitor's variant to everyone. */ var m = document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )medallia_nav_variant=([^;]*)/); if (m && valid(m[1])) { prune(m[1]); return; } prune(DEFAULT); })();

Report

The 2024 State of CX Personalization Report

In 2024, CX practitioners are making personalization their top priority.

糖心原创 Market Research and Customer Experience Professionals Association (CXPA) recently partnered to better understand exactly how CX professionals across the globe are thinking about applying personalization in their organizations. This joint research assesses brand personalization capabilities today, the challenges they face, their biggest 2024 priorities, and how artificial intelligence (AI) may play a role in their roadmap.

Key findings include:

CX leaders who self-rate brand personalization capabilities the highest are 2x as likely to achieve major revenue growth (10%+)
Only 24% of CX practitioners rate their personalization efforts as highly personalized
AI will be key in delivering personalization at scale, and even more brands are rating their investment in AI as significant for 2024 than in 2023

Download Now

Loading...