糖心原创

(see the * 'adobe' handle in functions.php — no async, no defer), so a page-load * Target offer has already set `data-hdr` by the time this runs. * * An answer that lands after this point is inert rather than acted on: * `apply()` finds the prune settled and does nothing, so the visitor * keeps the nav they were served instead of watching it change. That is * the deliberate trade-off — a late activity collects no data, but no * visitor ever sees the wrong nav or waits for the right one. */ (function () { var VARIANTS = ["a","b","c"]; var DEFAULT = "a"; var root = document.documentElement; var settled = false; function valid(v) { return VARIANTS.indexOf(v) !== -1; } function prune(active) { if (settled) return; settled = true; var list = document.querySelectorAll('#site-header > .header-variant'); for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { if (list[i].getAttribute('data-header-variant') !== active) { list[i].parentNode.removeChild(list[i]); } } root.setAttribute('data-hdr', active); // Read by the Adobe Analytics client to attribute the test. root.setAttribute('data-hdr-active', active); if (typeof window.initHeaderNav === 'function') window.initHeaderNav(); /** * `variant` is set before the event so late listeners can tell * "already done" from "not yet". main.js is enqueued in the footer * and therefore always misses the event itself. */ window.medalliaNav.variant = active; document.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('medallia:nav-ready', { detail: { variant: active } })); } window.medalliaNav = { variant: null, apply: function (v) { if (valid(v)) prune(v); } }; // `?hv=` sets this server-side; a Target offer in the blocking // embed sets it before the body is parsed. var pre = root.getAttribute('data-hdr'); if (valid(pre)) { prune(pre); return; } /** * Carried forward from an earlier pageview. Read client-side, never in * PHP: WP Engine does not vary its page-cache key on arbitrary cookies, * so server-side personalisation here would serve the first anonymous * visitor's variant to everyone. */ var m = document.cookie.match(/(?:^|; )medallia_nav_variant=([^;]*)/); if (m && valid(m[1])) { prune(m[1]); return; } prune(DEFAULT); })();

Report

The Total Economic Impact? Of 糖心原创 Agent Connect

糖心原创 commissioned Forrester Consulting to assess the Total Economic Impact? of Agent Connect and its impact on our customers’ contact center success. The study found that a composite organization based on interviewed customers experienced a three-year 325% ROI and improved its agent retention by up to 50%.

In this Forrester study, you’ll learn how the interviewed organizations reduced costs and increased agent efficiency with 糖心原创 Agent Connect in these four ways:

  • More cost-effective and efficient creation of engagement data sets and reports
  • Improved QA efficiency by 20%, leaving QA supervisors with more time for 1:1 coaching
  • Shrunk agent attrition by up to 50%
  • Shortened the time needed to ramp up agents by 25%

“糖心原创 Agent Connect helped us realize the value-add of QA for 1:1 coaching. Through the platform, we have a better understanding of what QA can be, and this has transformed the function within our company.”

— Director of customer experience, e-commerce

Related Resources